![]() ![]() |
- 16
- Hélène Cixous’s “stroboscopic” writing: a Deleuzian reading of the feminine text
- Chadova E.V. Hélène Cixous’s “stroboscopic” writing: a Deleuzian reading of the feminine text. Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 2025, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 117–125. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2025-31-2-117-125
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.34216/1998-0817-2025-31-2-117-125
- УДК: 821(44).09”20”
- EDN: QLKFSR
- Publish date: 2025-03-05
- Annotation: The article attempts to analyse the basic concepts of Hélène Cixous through the prism of the conceptual ideas of Gilles Louis René Deleuze, who devoted one of his articles to the her works in “Le Mondeˮ magazine. The conceptual outline of the philosophical works of Gilles Deleuze and Pierre-Félix Guattari related to the understanding of the textuality of Hélène Cixous (in particular, “Capitalism and Schizophrenia, “Hélène Cixous or Stroboscopic Writingˮ) is applied to her own idea of women’s writing (using the example of the texts “The Laugh of the Medusaˮ, “Coming to Writingˮ, etc.). The main part of the article compares Deleuze’s concepts, which are briefly applied to literary texts by Сixous in his article, and are more fully revealed in his philosophical works. The concept of “stroboscopic writingˮ becomes a significant term, which he uses in relation to the writer’s texts and notes that they have a special “speedˮ and “intensityˮ. The article concludes that the terms “feminine writingˮ and “stroboscopic writingˮ may be synonymous to some extent, as they share a number of characteristics peculiar to both. Deleuze’s ideas about nonlinearity and multiplicity make him an intellectual ally of Cixous, as her “stroboscopicˮ way of constructing a narrative negates the usual rules of rhythm and organisation. If traditional writing has a causal and sequential order, then Сixous replaces it with an internal movement of intensities, bursts of meaning that arise in different layers. As a result, it is concluded that Cixous’s “stroboscopic writingˮ can be compared with the idea of a “rhizome bookˮ, which offers us a non-linear unfolding and strengthening of connections instead of strictly dividing into a centre and a periphery.
- Keywords: women’s writing, poststructuralism, stroboscopic writing, intensity, French literature.
- Literature list: Ancyferova O.Y. Izvivy feministskogo literaturovedeniya (materialy k speckursu) [Twists of feminist literary studies (materials for a special course)]. Zhenshchina v rossijskom obshchestve [Woman in Russian society. Zhenshina v rossijskom obshestve], 2005, no. 3-4, pp. 1-10. Delëz Zh. Tysyacha plato: Kapitalizm i shizofreniya [A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia]. Ekaterinburg, U-Faktoriya Publ.; Moscow, Astrel' Publ., 2010, 895 p. (In Russ.) Moi T. Seksual'naya/tekstual'naya politika [Sexual/Textual politic]. Moscow, Progress-Tradiciya Publ., 2004, 237 p. (In Russ.) Nohlin L. Pochemu ne bylo velikih hudozhnic? [Why Have There Been No Great Women Artists?]. Gendernaya teoriya i iskusstvo. Antologiya 1970-2000 [Gender theory: Anthology, 1970–2000]. Moscow, Rosspen Publ., 2005, 593 p. (In Russ.) Siksu E. Hohot meduzy [The Laught of the Medusa]. Vvedenie v gendernye issledovaniya [Introduction to gender studies]. Saint-Petersburg, Aletejya Publ., 2019, 994 p. (In Russ.) Zherebkina I.A. Feministskaya literaturnaya kritika [Feminist literary critique, Introduction to Gender Studies]. St. Petersburg, Aletejya Publ., 2019, pp. 543-561. (In Russ.) Zdravomyslova E., Temkina A. Vvedenie. Feministskiĭ perevod: tekst, avtor, diskurs [Feminist translation: text, author, discourse]. St. Petersburg, Dmitrii Bulanin Publ., 2000, pp. 5-28. (In Russ.) Bergen V. The Powers of the Outside in Deleuze and Cixous. The Edinburgh Companion to Poststructuralism. Edinburgh University Press Publ., 2013, pp. 408-428. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748653690-028 Cixous H. Coming to Writing and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA and London, Harvard University Press Publ., 1991, 214 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/359019 Cixous H. L’Amour du loup et autres remords. Paris, Galilée, 2003, 224 p. Cixous H. The Laugh of the Medusa, trans. by Keith Cohen and Paula Cohen. Signs, 1976, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 875-893. Conley V.A. Hélène Cixous: Writing the Feminine. Lincoln and London, University of Nebraska Press Publ., 1984, 151 p. Deleuze G. Description de la femme: Pour une philosophie d’autrui sexuée. Poésie, 1945, no. 28, pp. 28-39. Deleuze G. Hélène Cixous or Stroboscopic Writing. Oxford Literary Review, 2002, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 203-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/olr.2002.013 Derrida J. H.C. La vie c’est à dire... Paris, Galilée, 2002, 135 p.